<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clearwire SUCKS [dot com] &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 06:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>From PC Mag &#8211; &#8220;Sprint: Clearwire Makes Us Suffer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/10/26/from-pc-mag-sprint-clearwire-makes-us-suffer/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/10/26/from-pc-mag-sprint-clearwire-makes-us-suffer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394333,00.asp#fbid=b5HEhgzewpt Sprint is utterly sick of Clearwire. The startlingly incompetent WiMAX provider has seemingly run out of patience from its majority owner. Sprint owns 54 percent of Clearwire, but apparently Clearwire&#8217;s management is so hapless that Sprint wouldn&#8217;t mind too much if the whole thing went bankrupt, as long as Sprint could make a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/10/26/from-pc-mag-sprint-clearwire-makes-us-suffer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site Updates / New Twitter Username</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/08/12/site-updates-new-twitter-username/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/08/12/site-updates-new-twitter-username/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some updates on the site. First, we have a new twitter name. You can follow us now at twitter.com/clearwiresucks. @clearwiresucks was previously taken, but it&#8217;s become available and has been transferred over to us. Second, someone hacked our robots.txt file and set it to disallow all search engines. This caused us to lose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/08/12/site-updates-new-twitter-username/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg: &#8220;Clearwire Dealers Say Credit Standards Dropped to Draw Thousands of Users&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/06/03/bloomberg-clearwire-dealers-say-credit-standards-dropped-to-draw-thousands-of-users/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/06/03/bloomberg-clearwire-dealers-say-credit-standards-dropped-to-draw-thousands-of-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dealer Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-03/clearwire-dealers-say-credit-standards-dropped-to-draw-customers.html The Bloomberg reporter who previously requested Clearwire Dealers contact her has published her story this morning. &#8220;Clearwire Corp. (CLWR) distributors lowered credit standards to attract thousands of new customers and inflate subscriber numbers starting in 2009, according to three former dealers. Clearwire employees told distributors to sign up customers with credit scores below the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/06/03/bloomberg-clearwire-dealers-say-credit-standards-dropped-to-draw-thousands-of-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention: All Clear/Clearwire Dealers who have had bad experiences working with Clear &#8211; Tell Bloomberg your story!</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/05/17/attention-all-clearclearwire-dealers-who-have-had-bad-experiences-working-with-clear/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/05/17/attention-all-clearclearwire-dealers-who-have-had-bad-experiences-working-with-clear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 01:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dealer Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were a Clear/Clearwire or are currently a dealer, and had a bad experience working with Clear/Clearwire or have been asked to perform shady practices, Bloomberg would like to hear from you. Please email your story to Amy Thomson at athomson6@bloomberg.net. She is doing a story on Clear/Clearwire and would like to have your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/05/17/attention-all-clearclearwire-dealers-who-have-had-bad-experiences-working-with-clear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwiresucks.com mentioned in PCWorld Article &#8211; &#8220;Many Unlimited Tech Services Appear to Have Limits&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/04/21/clearwiresucks-com-mentioned-in-pcworld-article-many-unlimited-tech-services-appear-to-have-limits/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/04/21/clearwiresucks-com-mentioned-in-pcworld-article-many-unlimited-tech-services-appear-to-have-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to share with all of you this PCWorld article that was published a couple weeks ago. This article features a short overview of the issues that we have posted here. There is a highlight of one post, and then also a short interview I had with the reporter regarding the site&#8217;s history and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/04/21/clearwiresucks-com-mentioned-in-pcworld-article-many-unlimited-tech-services-appear-to-have-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>seattlepi.com &#8211; &#8216;Project Star Trek&#8217;: Lawsuit alleges Clearwire executive fraud</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/04/03/seattlepi-com-project-star-trek-lawsuit-alleges-clearwire-executive-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/04/03/seattlepi-com-project-star-trek-lawsuit-alleges-clearwire-executive-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/04/03/seattlepi-com-project-star-trek-lawsuit-alleges-clearwire-executive-fraud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/Project-Star-Trek-Lawsuit-alleges-Clearwire-1318582.php#ixzz1ITReIGCV From the article: Clearwire executives are accused of scheming to fraudulently spike the company&#8217;s revenue by signing up customers who were not within wireless-Internet company&#8217;s coverage area, according to an ongoing lawsuit. The alleged plan, which the suit says was internally called &#8220;Project Star Trek,&#8221; involved the rigging of company software that its sales [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/04/03/seattlepi-com-project-star-trek-lawsuit-alleges-clearwire-executive-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwire CEO Quits!</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/03/10/clearwire-ceo-quits/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/03/10/clearwire-ceo-quits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Engadget, Clearwire&#8217;s CEO has resigned: Citing &#8220;personal reasons,&#8221; Clearwire boss Bill Morrow has rather suddenly stepped down from his positions both as CEO and executive board director. Replacing him on an interim basis will be John Stanton, current chairman of the board and former CEO of VoiceStream (a company you may know better [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/03/10/clearwire-ceo-quits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>lawsuit updated/amended &amp; refiled on 3/3/11 &#8211; User Submission</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/03/10/lawsuit-updatedamended-refiled-on-3311-user-submission/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/03/10/lawsuit-updatedamended-refiled-on-3311-user-submission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throttling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/03/10/lawsuit-updatedamended-refiled-on-3311-user-submission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI all, the lawsuit is proceeding and has been amended to include more and refiled on 3/3/11]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/03/10/lawsuit-updatedamended-refiled-on-3311-user-submission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwire gives up &#8211; User Submission by Alexander G.</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/02/09/clearwire-gives-up-user-submission-by-alexander-g/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/02/09/clearwire-gives-up-user-submission-by-alexander-g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks as though clearwire has given up in the Retail market! http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704858404576134633646323002.html (subscription required) http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/wsj-clearwire-moving-away-from-retail-will-concentrate-on-netw/ Hazaaa!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/02/09/clearwire-gives-up-user-submission-by-alexander-g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwire WhitePaper &#8211; Summary of 2.5GHz EBS Spectrum</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/01/28/clearwire-whitepaper-summary-of-2-5ghz-ebs-spectrum/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/01/28/clearwire-whitepaper-summary-of-2-5ghz-ebs-spectrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cellular Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received this submission a couple days ago from Brad Bowman , with a PDF submission as well as a link to an article he wrote. Here is a short summary of the report: Exploitation of the past FCC’s policy and rules encompassing acquisition and subsequent lack of deployment of our regional licensed 2.5GHz Educational [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/01/28/clearwire-whitepaper-summary-of-2-5ghz-ebs-spectrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit Filed Against Clear/Clearwire over Misleading Consumers</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/01/19/lawsuit-filed-against-clearclearwire-over-misleading-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/01/19/lawsuit-filed-against-clearclearwire-over-misleading-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throttling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received a submission today that included a link to a new lawsuit filed today against Clearwire/Clear: http://www.classactioncentral.com/2011/01/lawsuit-claims-clearwire-corporation-misled-consumers-over-internet-speeds/ From the article: Milberg LLP, a firm with a specialty in consumer protection litigation, has filed a class action lawsuit against Clearwire seeking to recover damages on behalf of certain Clearwire customers who were overcharged for a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2011/01/19/lawsuit-filed-against-clearclearwire-over-misleading-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clear EULA Eliminates Possibility of Class Action Suit Victory &#8211; User Submission by Jon L.</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/11/21/clear-eula-eliminates-possibility-of-class-action-suit-victory-user-submission-by-jon-l/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/11/21/clear-eula-eliminates-possibility-of-class-action-suit-victory-user-submission-by-jon-l/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are excerpts from the CLEAR License Agreement: d. Waiver of Right to Participate in a Class Actions and Waiver of Jury Trial. YOU AND CLEARWIRE HEREBY AGREE THAT ANY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER IN ARBITRATION OR COURT, WILL BE CONDUCTED ONLY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NOT IN A CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE ACTION. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/11/21/clear-eula-eliminates-possibility-of-class-action-suit-victory-user-submission-by-jon-l/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwire &#8211; As classy as always.</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/08/23/clearwire-as-classy-as-always/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/08/23/clearwire-as-classy-as-always/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Everyone, Check out this email I received in the submission queue today: Domains by Proxy? If this was a legit site you wouldn’t have to hide your identity, but props on making it look so ‘amateur’ to throw off the masses. I just wonder which one of our competitors are funding this project. Beau [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/08/23/clearwire-as-classy-as-always/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNBC Article on Clearwiresucks.com &#8211; Anonymous User Submission</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/07/15/cnbc-article-on-clearwiresucks-com-anonymous-user-submission/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/07/15/cnbc-article-on-clearwiresucks-com-anonymous-user-submission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To Clearwiresucks creator- I found the below article by Jane Wells at CNBC posted yesterday &#8220;Is WiMAX Workable?&#8221;. She cites the exact complaints many of us have. Clear corporate has already begun a spin campaign against her even though the article is BURIED on her personal blog. Clear corporate/lovers are saying &#8220;no one has complained&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/07/15/cnbc-article-on-clearwiresucks-com-anonymous-user-submission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwire Noise Problem &#8211; User Submission by Stephanie S.</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/01/25/clearwire-noise-problem-user-submission-by-stephanie-s/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/01/25/clearwire-noise-problem-user-submission-by-stephanie-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearwire is blanketing Portland, Oregon in NOISE not WiMax. http://mtna-landuse.blogspot.com/2010/01/noise-of-clearwires-wireless-internet.html Early claims from Clearwire were that the 4G signal would cover a 20 mile radius. So why does Clearwire intend to put up poles every 1500 feet in Tampa, Florida? Why have they installed over 60 of of them in Portland, Oregon, which is only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2010/01/25/clearwire-noise-problem-user-submission-by-stephanie-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearwire Sales/Churn data leaked</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2009/08/18/clearwire-saleschurn-data-leaked/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2009/08/18/clearwire-saleschurn-data-leaked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearwire Sales/Churn data leaked: http://groups.google.com/group/wimax-hacking/browse_thread/thread/f5a5647b79256889?hl=en]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2009/08/18/clearwire-saleschurn-data-leaked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprint doesn&#8217;t need Clearwire</title>
		<link>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2007/11/09/sprint-doesnt-need-clearwire/</link>
		<comments>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2007/11/09/sprint-doesnt-need-clearwire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2007/11/09/sprint-doesnt-need-clearwire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sprint/Clearwire deal is off! Sprint is still planning on furthering their WiMAX plans alone. Good for them! The internet on my Sprint cell phone used to tether to my computer when Clearwire was down, and it would actually be faster on an at-the-time non-EvDO network. So, I&#8217;m sure Sprint could do it right. Also, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2007/11/09/sprint-doesnt-need-clearwire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

