Comments on: Clearwire Sucks – User Submission by Jimmie O. http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2009/12/21/clearwire-sucks-user-submission-by-jimmie-o/ Tue, 15 May 2012 05:02:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Pat C. http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2009/12/21/clearwire-sucks-user-submission-by-jimmie-o/comment-page-1/#comment-18199 Pat C. Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:24:51 +0000 http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=745#comment-18199 What a joke of an internet provider, I was told there would be increased towers in my area(right in the middle of town) almost 1 year ago. Nothing has changed, still only receive 1 out of five bers of service. These jerks tell you another one of aesops fables every time you talk to them Never once have the statements ive received been the same. I would advise against getting involved with Unclear internet service. What a joke of an internet provider, I was told there would be increased towers in my area(right in the middle of town) almost 1 year ago. Nothing has changed, still only receive 1 out of five bers of service. These jerks tell you another one of aesops fables every time you talk to them Never once have the statements ive received been the same. I would advise against getting involved with Unclear internet service.

]]> By: James http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/2009/12/21/clearwire-sucks-user-submission-by-jimmie-o/comment-page-1/#comment-18011 James Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:02:54 +0000 http://clearwiresucks.com/blog/?p=745#comment-18011 The problem with Clearwire is several-fold: 1. Cell site separation is too distant and thus, the drop-off in energy (which is proportional to subscriber distance to the local site) causes inferior data rates. This is a direct cause of poor topology planning that is inconsistent with hornbook radio engineering algorithms. They've been warned by myself and others about inappropriate systems engineering techniques dictated by their CTO. 2. No. "1." above was stimulated by Clearwire's desire to save on system construction money. The less cell sites, the less capital expenditure, the less system speed, the less customer satisfaction. Probability of going out of business = Greater than 90% (yet the big investors, who trust the engineering acumen of the Clearwire executive staff, keep pouring money in). Clearwire stock is still in the $6.50 area, which is down from a $25.00 start. It will never bounce back because they will never fire the senior technical corporate officers and replace them with hardcore RF systems people that know what they are doing. This is about lack of competency and and screwing customers for the sake of saving construction bucks ... and nothing else. Regards. James The problem with Clearwire is several-fold:
1. Cell site separation is too distant and thus, the drop-off in energy (which is proportional to subscriber distance to the local site) causes inferior data rates. This is a direct cause of poor topology planning that is inconsistent with hornbook radio engineering algorithms. They’ve been warned by myself and others about inappropriate systems engineering techniques dictated by their CTO.

2. No. “1.” above was stimulated by Clearwire’s desire to save on system construction money. The less cell sites, the less capital expenditure, the less system speed, the less customer satisfaction.

Probability of going out of business = Greater than 90% (yet the big investors, who trust the engineering acumen of the Clearwire executive staff, keep pouring money in). Clearwire stock is still in the $6.50 area, which is down from a $25.00 start. It will never bounce back because they will never fire the senior technical corporate officers and replace them with hardcore RF systems people that know what they are doing.

This is about lack of competency and and screwing customers for the sake of saving construction bucks … and nothing else.

Regards.

James

]]>